Skip to content

Tech head-to-head

Apple Magic MousevsKeychron Q1

Age hasn't cost the 2021 Keychron Q1 the lead: it averages 8.4 against 6.8 for the 2024 Apple Magic Mouse, and takes Ease of use 7.8 to 5.4.

Beautiful, gesture-rich, and shaped in a way that most hands stop tolerating after an hour.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Keychron Q1

Keychron

8.4

A gasket-mounted aluminum board with QMK firmware, sold assembled instead of as a kit.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Ease of use, Keychron Q1 ahead 7.8 to 5.4. They come closest on Design, 8.8 to 8.6. Left of center is Apple Magic Mouse, right is Keychron Q1.

Apple Magic Mouse versus Keychron Q1 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Apple Magic Mouse run left from the axis labels, bars for Keychron Q1 run right. Apple Magic Mouse: Performance 6.8, Value 5.6, Durability 7.8, Ease of use 5.4, Design 8.6. Keychron Q1: Performance 8.8, Value 7.6, Durability 9.0, Ease of use 7.8, Design 8.8.Apple Magic Mouse (left)Keychron Q1 (right)PerformanceApple Magic Mouse — Performance 6.8 out of 106.8Keychron Q1 — Performance 8.8 out of 108.8ValueApple Magic Mouse — Value 5.6 out of 105.6Keychron Q1 — Value 7.6 out of 107.6DurabilityApple Magic Mouse — Durability 7.8 out of 107.8Keychron Q1 — Durability 9.0 out of 109.0Ease of useApple Magic Mouse — Ease of use 5.4 out of 105.4Keychron Q1 — Ease of use 7.8 out of 107.8DesignApple Magic Mouse — Design 8.6 out of 108.6Keychron Q1 — Design 8.8 out of 108.8Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Apple Magic Mouse

  • macOS gesture navigation is central to how you work
  • The mouse spends more time being looked at than used
  • You want something that disappears into a minimal desk

Take the Keychron Q1

Leads on Performance, Value, Durability, Ease of use and Design.

  • You want to remap every key without vendor software running in the background
  • Typing feel is worth more to you than portability
  • You expect to swap switches rather than replace the board

What each one gets wrong

Apple Magic Mouse

  • You use a mouse for more than about an hour at a time
  • Charging from a port on the underside is an obvious problem

Keychron Q1

  • You need it to travel — this is close to two kilograms
  • Wired-only, or the wireless variant premium, is a problem

Specs, side by side

SpecApple Magic MouseKeychron Q1
SurfaceMulti-touch gestures
ChargingUSB-C port on the underside
ProfileAlmost flat
Layout75 percent
CaseCNC aluminum
SwitchesHot-swappable
FirmwareQMK and VIA

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

The Apple Magic Mouse is 3 years newer. Why does it score lower?
Because the axes didn't move the way the release dates suggest. The 2021 model takes Performance, Value, Durability, Ease of use and Design, widest on Ease of use at 7.8 to 5.4. The 2024 model doesn't lead a single axis.
What did the 2024 model improve?
Nothing that shows up in the 5 axes. Its own listed weakness reads: You use a mouse for more than about an hour at a time.
Which one ranks higher in "A desk that looks right, and what it costs the hand"?
Keychron Q1 sits at #1 in "A desk that looks right, and what it costs the hand", Apple Magic Mouse at #2.