Skip to content

Tech head-to-head

Apple Magic MousevsKingston XS2000

Age hasn't cost the 2021 Kingston XS2000 the lead: it averages 7.5 against 6.8 for the 2024 Apple Magic Mouse, and takes Value 8.2 to 5.6.

Beautiful, gesture-rich, and shaped in a way that most hands stop tolerating after an hour.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

7.5

Pocket-sized 20 Gbps storage that runs hot and owes its rating to a sleeve you can lose.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Kingston XS2000 ahead 8.2 to 5.6. They come closest on Durability, 7.8 to 6.6. Left of center is Apple Magic Mouse, right is Kingston XS2000.

Apple Magic Mouse versus Kingston XS2000 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Apple Magic Mouse run left from the axis labels, bars for Kingston XS2000 run right. Apple Magic Mouse: Performance 6.8, Value 5.6, Durability 7.8, Ease of use 5.4, Design 8.6. Kingston XS2000: Performance 8.8, Value 8.2, Durability 6.6, Ease of use 7.0, Design 7.0.Apple Magic Mouse (left)Kingston XS2000 (right)PerformanceApple Magic Mouse — Performance 6.8 out of 106.8Kingston XS2000 — Performance 8.8 out of 108.8ValueApple Magic Mouse — Value 5.6 out of 105.6Kingston XS2000 — Value 8.2 out of 108.2DurabilityApple Magic Mouse — Durability 7.8 out of 107.8Kingston XS2000 — Durability 6.6 out of 106.6Ease of useApple Magic Mouse — Ease of use 5.4 out of 105.4Kingston XS2000 — Ease of use 7.0 out of 107.0DesignApple Magic Mouse — Design 8.6 out of 108.6Kingston XS2000 — Design 7.0 out of 107.0Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Apple Magic Mouse

Leads on Durability and Design.

  • macOS gesture navigation is central to how you work
  • The mouse spends more time being looked at than used
  • You want something that disappears into a minimal desk

Take the Kingston XS2000

Leads on Performance, Value and Ease of use.

  • A Windows machine with a 20 Gbps port and short bursty transfers
  • The drive has to disappear into a shirt pocket
  • You manage your own encryption and want nothing preinstalled

What each one gets wrong

Apple Magic Mouse

  • You use a mouse for more than about an hour at a time
  • Charging from a port on the underside is an obvious problem

Kingston XS2000

  • Long sustained writes are the normal workload
  • You want encryption and backup software in the box
  • Losing a small rubber sleeve would bother you

Specs, side by side

SpecApple Magic MouseKingston XS2000
SurfaceMulti-touch gestures
ChargingUSB-C port on the underside
ProfileAlmost flat
InterfaceUSB 3.2 Gen 2x2
ShellMetal and plastic, IP55 with sleeve
Capacities500 GB to 4 TB
Warranty5 years limited

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

The Apple Magic Mouse is 3 years newer. Why does it score lower?
Because the axes didn't move the way the release dates suggest. The 2021 model takes Performance, Value and Ease of use, widest on Value at 8.2 to 5.6. Durability and Design are where the 2024 model answers, and whether that is enough is the whole question.
What did the 2024 model improve?
Durability and Design. Durability runs 7.8 to 6.6; Design runs 8.6 to 7.0. That is not enough to move the average, which stays 7.5 to 6.8.
Which one ranks higher in "Every one of these is excellent for about an hour"?
Kingston XS2000 sits at #1 in "Every one of these is excellent for about an hour", Apple Magic Mouse at #4.