Appliances head-to-head
Austin Air HealthMate HM400vsCoway Airmega 400
27 years between them: the 2017 Coway Airmega 400 at 8.0, the 1990 Austin Air HealthMate HM400 at 7.2. The older one still holds Durability.
Austin Air HealthMate HM400
Austin Air
7.2
Welded steel, fifteen pounds of carbon, a five-year filter, and no interest in being quiet.
Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.
Coway Airmega 400
Coway
8.0
A heavy-duty purifier sized for the large open rooms most portable units quietly cannot handle.
Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.
Where they diverge
The widest gap is Ease of use, Coway Airmega 400 ahead 8.2 to 5.6. They come closest on Performance, 9.0 to 8.8. Left of center is Austin Air HealthMate HM400, right is Coway Airmega 400.
Which one to pick
Take the Austin Air HealthMate HM400
Leads on Durability.
- Chemicals, gases, and VOCs, where carbon weight decides the outcome
- You want no firmware, no sensor, and nothing that can stop being supported
- A five-year filter interval instead of a cartridge twice a year
Take the Coway Airmega 400
Leads on Performance, Value, Ease of use and Quietness.
- A room large enough that smaller units cycle constantly
- You want a sensor-driven auto mode that reacts to the room instead of a fixed speed
- Dual-sided intake suits where the unit has to sit
What each one gets wrong
Austin Air HealthMate HM400
- It has to run in a bedroom — even the low setting is an audible fan
- You want auto mode, a timer, or any readout of what the air is doing
- The machine will move between rooms; this one goes somewhere and stays
Coway Airmega 400
- Proprietary filters that cost real money every six months
- Floor space is tight — the footprint is substantial
Specs, side by side
| Spec | Austin Air HealthMate HM400 | Coway Airmega 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Filtration | Four stages — two pre-filters, 60 sq ft HEPA, 15 lb carbon and zeolite | — |
| Airflow | Three-speed motor, up to 400 CFM | — |
| Filter life | Rated up to five years | — |
| Build | Welded steel, powder coated, about 47 lb, on casters | — |
| Coverage | — | Very large rooms |
| Filter | — | Dual intake, HEPA plus carbon |
| Sensor | — | Laser particle sensor, four-color indicator |
Rankings they both appear in
Questions
- Is the 2017 Coway Airmega 400 the safer pick over the 1990 Austin Air HealthMate HM400?
- Coway Airmega 400 leads on Performance, Value, Ease of use and Quietness. If Durability matters more to you, take the Austin Air HealthMate HM400 instead. The 27-year gap shows in the totals as 8.0 against 7.2.
- What does the 1990 model still win?
- On Durability, yes. That axis still goes to the 1990 model. The 2017 one answers with Performance, Value, Ease of use and Quietness.
- Which one ranks higher in "Throughput is cheap in a room nobody sleeps in"?
- Coway Airmega 400 sits at #1 in "Throughput is cheap in a room nobody sleeps in", Austin Air HealthMate HM400 at #3.