Skip to content

Tech head-to-head

Casio fx-9750GIIIvsTI-84 Plus

15 years apart and the average barely moved: 7.9 for the 2019 Casio fx-9750GIII, 7.7 for the 2004 TI-84 Plus. Value is the axis that did move, 9.2 to 8.4.

A full graphing calculator with Python, allowed on the SAT, ACT, and AP exams, at a fraction of a TI's cost.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens current listings on eBay. eBay listings come from individual sellers: condition, battery health, and what's in the box differ from one to the next, so read the listing and the return terms before you buy.

TI-84 Plus

Texas Instruments

7.7

The monochrome original that schools bought by the crate. Indestructible, everywhere on eBay, and visibly old.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens current listings on eBay. eBay listings come from individual sellers: condition, battery health, and what's in the box differ from one to the next, so read the listing and the return terms before you buy.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Casio fx-9750GIII ahead 9.2 to 8.4. They come closest on Ease of use, 8.2 to 7.8. Left of center is Casio fx-9750GIII, right is TI-84 Plus.

Casio fx-9750GIII versus TI-84 Plus — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Casio fx-9750GIII run left from the axis labels, bars for TI-84 Plus run right. Casio fx-9750GIII: Performance 7.4, Value 9.2, Durability 8.0, Ease of use 7.8, Design 7.0. TI-84 Plus: Performance 6.8, Value 8.4, Durability 8.6, Ease of use 8.2, Design 6.4.Casio fx-9750GIII (left)TI-84 Plus (right)PerformanceCasio fx-9750GIII — Performance 7.4 out of 107.4TI-84 Plus — Performance 6.8 out of 106.8ValueCasio fx-9750GIII — Value 9.2 out of 109.2TI-84 Plus — Value 8.4 out of 108.4DurabilityCasio fx-9750GIII — Durability 8.0 out of 108.0TI-84 Plus — Durability 8.6 out of 108.6Ease of useCasio fx-9750GIII — Ease of use 7.8 out of 107.8TI-84 Plus — Ease of use 8.2 out of 108.2DesignCasio fx-9750GIII — Design 7.0 out of 107.0TI-84 Plus — Design 6.4 out of 106.4Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Casio fx-9750GIII

Leads on Performance, Value and Design.

  • You need a graphing calculator for one course and would rather not spend TI money
  • You want a backup calculator in the bag for test day
  • You'd rather swap AAA batteries than keep track of a charger

Take the TI-84 Plus

Leads on Durability and Ease of use.

  • You want the same keystrokes your teacher uses for very little money
  • It's a loaner or a spare that may get lost or dropped
  • You want a calculator that runs on any AAA in a drawer

What each one gets wrong

Casio fx-9750GIII

  • Your teacher will demonstrate every step on a TI-84 and you'll want the menus to match
  • You need a color screen to tell overlapping graphs apart

TI-84 Plus

  • Overlapping graphs on a low-resolution screen will slow you down
  • The listing shows "Property of" engraving, because school units are often sold without the school's say

Specs, side by side

SpecCasio fx-9750GIIITI-84 Plus
DisplayMonochrome, 128×64Monochrome, 96×64
Power4 AAA batteries4 AAA batteries plus a backup coin cell
ProgrammingCasio Basic, Python—
ConnectivityUSBMini-USB and link port
Exam modeBuilt-in exam mode—
Memory—480KB archive, 24KB RAM (TI)

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Is the 2019 Casio fx-9750GIII the safer pick over the 2004 TI-84 Plus?
Casio fx-9750GIII leads on Performance, Value and Design. If Durability and Ease of use matter more to you, take the TI-84 Plus instead. The 15-year gap shows in the totals as 7.9 against 7.7.
What does the 2004 model still win?
On Durability and Ease of use, yes. Those axes still go to the 2004 model. The 2019 one answers with Performance, Value and Design.
Which one ranks higher in "Graphing calculators to buy used, by exam"?
Casio fx-9750GIII sits at #3 in "Graphing calculators to buy used, by exam", TI-84 Plus at #4.