Skip to content

Outdoors head-to-head

Fenix HM65R-TvsNalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz

The 4 axes split 2-2 and the averages still land 8.3 to 8.0. Performance is the widest of them, 9.4 to 6.4.

8.3

Magnesium body, removable 18650, and enough throw to run singletrack at night.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

No insulation, no pretence, and effectively unbreakable — the durability floor for everything else.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Performance, Fenix HM65R-T ahead 9.4 to 6.4. They come closest on Durability, 9.6 to 9.2. Left of center is Fenix HM65R-T, right is Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz.

Fenix HM65R-T versus Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 4 axes. Bars for Fenix HM65R-T run left from the axis labels, bars for Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz run right. Fenix HM65R-T: Performance 9.4, Value 6.8, Durability 9.2, Design 7.8. Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz: Performance 6.4, Value 9.6, Durability 9.6, Design 6.4.Fenix HM65R-T (left)Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz (right)PerformanceFenix HM65R-T — Performance 9.4 out of 109.4Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — Performance 6.4 out of 106.4ValueFenix HM65R-T — Value 6.8 out of 106.8Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — Value 9.6 out of 109.6DurabilityFenix HM65R-T — Durability 9.2 out of 109.2Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — Durability 9.6 out of 109.6DesignFenix HM65R-T — Design 7.8 out of 107.8Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — Design 6.4 out of 106.4Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Fenix HM65R-T

Leads on Performance and Design.

  • Night trail running, where seeing thirty meters ahead decides your pace
  • Search, night work, and anything that has to keep going past midnight
  • You already own 18650 cells and a charger, so spares cost nothing new

Take the Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz

Leads on Value and Durability.

  • Weight and cost matter more than temperature
  • Measuring water for cooking or for filter systems
  • Backcountry use where a dented vacuum bottle is a dead bottle

What each one gets wrong

Fenix HM65R-T

  • Weight on the forehead matters; this is the heavy end of the category
  • You want it to run at 1,500 lumens rather than step down to hold temperature
  • Simple is the goal — two buttons and separate emitters take learning

Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz

  • You want a cold drink to still be cold in four hours
  • Condensation on the outside will be a problem

Specs, side by side

SpecFenix HM65R-TNalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz
Max output1,500 lumens combined — 1,300 spot, 400 flood
PowerOne 18650 cell included, or two CR123A
BodyMagnesium alloy
Water resistanceIP68
ChargingUSB-C, about three hours
MaterialSingle-wall Tritan (BPA-free revision)
MarkingsVolume graduations on the side
WeightUnder 180 grams

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Fenix HM65R-T or Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz — which should I buy?
Fenix HM65R-T takes Performance and Design; Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz takes Value and Durability. Neither leads on more axes than the other, so it comes down to which of those you care about.
Is 0.3 a real difference?
Barely. Fenix HM65R-T averages 8.3 and Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz averages 8.0, and the total is the plain average of 4 axes, so 0.3 is what one axis moving 1.2 looks like after averaging. The axis split, 2-2, tells you more.
Which one ranks higher in "Most of this gear dies between trips"?
Nalgene Wide Mouth 32 oz sits at #1 in "Most of this gear dies between trips", Fenix HM65R-T at #3.