Skip to content
Nungeum

Tech head-to-head

Keychron Q1vsRedragon K552 Kumara

6 years between them: the 2021 Keychron Q1 at 8.4, the 2015 Redragon K552 Kumara at 7.3. The older one still holds Value.

Keychron Q1

Keychron

8.4

A gasket-mounted aluminum board with QMK firmware, sold assembled instead of as a kit.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Redragon K552 Kumara

Redragon

7.3

The budget mechanical board people actually buy, with the compromises sitting exactly where you expect.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Durability, Keychron Q1 ahead 9.0 to 6.2. They come closest on Ease of use, 7.8 to 7.6. Left of center is Keychron Q1, right is Redragon K552 Kumara.

Keychron Q1 versus Redragon K552 Kumara — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Keychron Q1 run left from the axis labels, bars for Redragon K552 Kumara run right. Keychron Q1: Performance 8.8, Value 7.6, Durability 9.0, Ease of use 7.8, Design 8.8. Redragon K552 Kumara: Performance 6.8, Value 9.4, Durability 6.2, Ease of use 7.6, Design 6.4.Keychron Q1 (left)Redragon K552 Kumara (right)PerformanceKeychron Q1 — Performance 8.8 out of 108.8Redragon K552 Kumara — Performance 6.8 out of 106.8ValueKeychron Q1 — Value 7.6 out of 107.6Redragon K552 Kumara — Value 9.4 out of 109.4DurabilityKeychron Q1 — Durability 9.0 out of 109.0Redragon K552 Kumara — Durability 6.2 out of 106.2Ease of useKeychron Q1 — Ease of use 7.8 out of 107.8Redragon K552 Kumara — Ease of use 7.6 out of 107.6DesignKeychron Q1 — Design 8.8 out of 108.8Redragon K552 Kumara — Design 6.4 out of 106.4Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Keychron Q1

Leads on Performance, Durability, Ease of use and Design.

  • You want to remap every key without vendor software running in the background
  • Typing feel is worth more to you than portability
  • You expect to swap switches rather than replace the board

Take the Redragon K552 Kumara

Leads on Value.

  • A first mechanical keyboard you are not yet sure you will keep
  • A second board for a spare desk or a shared machine
  • You want a tenkeyless layout without committing much to it

What each one gets wrong

Keychron Q1

  • You need it to travel — this is close to two kilograms
  • Wired-only, or the wireless variant premium, is a problem

Redragon K552 Kumara

  • You want a predictable unit — one model number covers several builds
  • Keycap legends and surface finish matter to you past the first year
  • You want a detachable cable or firmware you can configure

Specs, side by side

SpecKeychron Q1Redragon K552 Kumara
Layout75 percentTenkeyless, 87 keys
CaseCNC aluminum—
SwitchesHot-swappableOutemu, type varies by revision
FirmwareQMK and VIA—
Frame—Metal top plate over an ABS body
Switch rating—50 million keystrokes, per Redragon

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Is the 2021 Keychron Q1 the safer pick over the 2015 Redragon K552 Kumara?
Keychron Q1 leads on Performance, Durability, Ease of use and Design. If Value matters more to you, take the Redragon K552 Kumara instead. The 6-year gap shows in the totals as 8.4 against 7.3.
What does the 2015 model still win?
On Value, yes. That axis still goes to the 2015 model. The 2021 one answers with Performance, Durability, Ease of use and Design.
Which one ranks higher in "Layout is the guess no keyboard lets you take back"?
Redragon K552 Kumara sits at #1 in "Layout is the guess no keyboard lets you take back", Keychron Q1 at #3.