Skip to content

Kitchen head-to-head

Oster Pro 1200vsVitamix A3500

Vitamix A3500 takes the average, 7.8 to 7.2, but Oster Pro 1200 wins the widest axis on the page: Value, by 2.8.

7.2

A glass jar and an all-metal drive, warrantied ten years on the part that usually shears off.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

7.8

A ten-year warranty, a tamper, and a self-clean cycle. Noise is what the drivetrain costs.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Oster Pro 1200 ahead 9.0 to 6.2. They come closest on Quietness, 6.0 to 5.4. Left of center is Oster Pro 1200, right is Vitamix A3500.

Oster Pro 1200 versus Vitamix A3500 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Oster Pro 1200 run left from the axis labels, bars for Vitamix A3500 run right. Oster Pro 1200: Performance 7.0, Value 9.0, Durability 7.4, Ease of use 6.8, Quietness 6.0. Vitamix A3500: Performance 9.4, Value 6.2, Durability 9.2, Ease of use 8.6, Quietness 5.4.Oster Pro 1200 (left)Vitamix A3500 (right)PerformanceOster Pro 1200 — Performance 7.0 out of 107.0Vitamix A3500 — Performance 9.4 out of 109.4ValueOster Pro 1200 — Value 9.0 out of 109.0Vitamix A3500 — Value 6.2 out of 106.2DurabilityOster Pro 1200 — Durability 7.4 out of 107.4Vitamix A3500 — Durability 9.2 out of 109.2Ease of useOster Pro 1200 — Ease of use 6.8 out of 106.8Vitamix A3500 — Ease of use 8.6 out of 108.6QuietnessOster Pro 1200 — Quietness 6.0 out of 106.0Vitamix A3500 — Quietness 5.4 out of 105.4Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Oster Pro 1200

Leads on Value and Quietness.

  • Glass rather than plastic, if scratching and held odours in a jar bother you
  • Milkshakes, salsas, and a daily smoothie rather than nut butter
  • A ten-year drive warranty at the budget end of the market

Take the Vitamix A3500

Leads on Performance, Durability and Ease of use.

  • Nut butters, doughs, and hot soup — jobs that stall lesser machines
  • You keep appliances for a decade and want containers still orderable then
  • Frozen batches thick enough that a tamper is the only way through

What each one gets wrong

Oster Pro 1200

  • Lifting a full jar one-handed — wet glass is heavy and the handle is small
  • Fibrous greens and dates, which come out gritty rather than smooth
  • You need a machine that will run six minutes straight without a break

Vitamix A3500

  • Thin walls or a sleeping household; this is among the loudest machines here
  • You blend a single cup at a time — a 64 oz container needs volume to circulate
  • Your upper cabinets sit lower than seventeen inches above the counter

Specs, side by side

SpecOster Pro 1200Vitamix A3500
Motor1,200 watts, 900 watts of ice crushing power2.2 peak horsepower
Jar6-cup Boroclass glass
SpeedsSeven speeds with three preset programs
DriveAll-metal drive, 10-year limited warranty
Size8 x 7.25 x 14.5 in11 x 8 x 17 in
Container64 oz low-profile with Self-Detect
ControlsTouchscreen, variable speed dial, pulse, timer
ProgramsSmoothies, hot soups, dips, frozen desserts, self-clean
Warranty10-year full warranty

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Vitamix A3500 scores higher. Why would anyone take Oster Pro 1200?
Because of Value, where Oster Pro 1200 wins 9.0 to 6.2, the biggest single gap between them. That axis covers what the same money buys elsewhere. The 0.6 overall lead sits on Performance, Durability and Ease of use instead.
How much does the overall lead mean here?
Less than the number suggests. Oster Pro 1200 averages 7.2 and Vitamix A3500 averages 7.8, but the axes split 3-2, and the widest of them runs against the leader.
Which one ranks higher in "Batch size decides a blender before wattage does"?
Vitamix A3500 sits at #2 in "Batch size decides a blender before wattage does", Oster Pro 1200 at #3.