Skip to content
Nungeum

Tech head-to-head

Anker Soundcore Space Q45vsJBL Tour One M2

7.7 against 7.8 overall, which settles nothing. Anker Soundcore Space Q45 takes Value 9.2 to 8.6, and that is the axis to decide on.

Anker Soundcore Space Q45

Anker

7.7

Roughly eighty percent of a flagship for a fraction of the outlay, and that gap is in the details.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

JBL Tour One M2

JBL

7.8

The folding, feature-dense middle option: most of the flagship checklist, none of the materials.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Anker Soundcore Space Q45 ahead 9.2 to 8.6. They come closest on Durability, 7.2 to 7.0. Left of center is Anker Soundcore Space Q45, right is JBL Tour One M2.

Anker Soundcore Space Q45 versus JBL Tour One M2 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Anker Soundcore Space Q45 run left from the axis labels, bars for JBL Tour One M2 run right. Anker Soundcore Space Q45: Performance 7.6, Value 9.2, Durability 7.0, Ease of use 7.6, Design 7.0. JBL Tour One M2: Performance 8.0, Value 8.6, Durability 7.2, Ease of use 8.2, Design 6.8.Anker Soundcore Space Q45 (left)JBL Tour One M2 (right)PerformanceAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Performance 7.6 out of 107.6JBL Tour One M2 — Performance 8.0 out of 108.0ValueAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Value 9.2 out of 109.2JBL Tour One M2 — Value 8.6 out of 108.6DurabilityAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Durability 7.0 out of 107.0JBL Tour One M2 — Durability 7.2 out of 107.2Ease of useAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Ease of use 7.6 out of 107.6JBL Tour One M2 — Ease of use 8.2 out of 108.2DesignAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Design 7.0 out of 107.0JBL Tour One M2 — Design 6.8 out of 106.8Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Anker Soundcore Space Q45

Leads on Value and Design.

  • A first pair of proper noise-cancelling headphones
  • You lose or break headphones regularly
  • LDAC support matters but flagship pricing does not

Take the JBL Tour One M2

Leads on Performance, Durability and Ease of use.

  • Packing small matters and you want a hard case in the box
  • Calls are a daily part of the job rather than an occasional thing
  • You will actually use an equalizer and a hearing-calibration routine

What each one gets wrong

Anker Soundcore Space Q45

  • You are sensitive to cabin pressure that the ANC does not fully remove
  • Hinges and headband plastics need to survive years of abuse

JBL Tour One M2

  • The stock tuning leans hard on bass and needs the app to settle down
  • You dislike headphones whose features live inside a phone app
  • Plastics where the flagships use metal will bother you in a year

Specs, side by side

SpecAnker Soundcore Space Q45JBL Tour One M2
TypeOver-ear, closedOver-ear, closed
CodecsSBC, AAC, LDAC—
BatteryAbout 50 hrs with ANC onUp to 30 hrs with ANC on, 50 hrs off
Folding—Folds inward, hard case included
Drivers—40 mm dynamic

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Only 0.1 separates them. What breaks the tie?
Value does, at 9.2 against 8.6. That axis covers what the same money buys elsewhere. JBL Tour One M2 leads on Performance, Durability and Ease of use. If Value and Design matter more to you, take the Anker Soundcore Space Q45 instead.
Why are the totals this close?
The total is the plain average of the 5 Tech axes, so opposite results cancel. Anker Soundcore Space Q45 averages 7.7 and JBL Tour One M2 averages 7.8, a gap of 0.1, while the individual axes run as far apart as 0.6.
Which one ranks higher in "Below the ANC flagships, materials go first"?
Anker Soundcore Space Q45 sits at #2 in "Below the ANC flagships, materials go first", JBL Tour One M2 at #3.