Skip to content
Nungeum

Tech head-to-head

Anker Soundcore Space Q45vsTechnics EAH-A800

Both average 7.7, which settles nothing. Technics EAH-A800 takes Performance 8.8 to 7.6, and that is the axis to decide on.

Anker Soundcore Space Q45

Anker

7.7

Roughly eighty percent of a flagship for a fraction of the outlay, and that gap is in the details.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Technics EAH-A800

Technics

7.7

Fifty hours and cancellation near the top of the class, in a frame nobody talks about.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Performance, Technics EAH-A800 ahead 8.8 to 7.6. They come closest on Ease of use, 7.6 to 7.2. Left of center is Anker Soundcore Space Q45, right is Technics EAH-A800.

Anker Soundcore Space Q45 versus Technics EAH-A800 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Anker Soundcore Space Q45 run left from the axis labels, bars for Technics EAH-A800 run right. Anker Soundcore Space Q45: Performance 7.6, Value 9.2, Durability 7.0, Ease of use 7.6, Design 7.0. Technics EAH-A800: Performance 8.8, Value 8.2, Durability 7.5, Ease of use 7.2, Design 6.6.Anker Soundcore Space Q45 (left)Technics EAH-A800 (right)PerformanceAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Performance 7.6 out of 107.6Technics EAH-A800 — Performance 8.8 out of 108.8ValueAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Value 9.2 out of 109.2Technics EAH-A800 — Value 8.2 out of 108.2DurabilityAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Durability 7.0 out of 107.0Technics EAH-A800 — Durability 7.5 out of 107.5Ease of useAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Ease of use 7.6 out of 107.6Technics EAH-A800 — Ease of use 7.2 out of 107.2DesignAnker Soundcore Space Q45 — Design 7.0 out of 107.0Technics EAH-A800 — Design 6.6 out of 106.6Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Anker Soundcore Space Q45

Leads on Value, Ease of use and Design.

  • A first pair of proper noise-cancelling headphones
  • You lose or break headphones regularly
  • LDAC support matters but flagship pricing does not

Take the Technics EAH-A800

Leads on Performance and Durability.

  • Long-haul flying, where cancellation and charging intervals both matter
  • An Android phone, since LDAC is doing real work here
  • You want a pair that folds small without dropping to mid-tier cancellation

What each one gets wrong

Anker Soundcore Space Q45

  • You are sensitive to cabin pressure that the ANC does not fully remove
  • Hinges and headband plastics need to survive years of abuse

Technics EAH-A800

  • You are left-handed, or you want controls split across both cups
  • Weight on the crown of the head bothers you over a long session
  • You expect a dense retail and accessory network behind the brand

Specs, side by side

SpecAnker Soundcore Space Q45Technics EAH-A800
TypeOver-ear, closedOver-ear, closed
CodecsSBC, AAC, LDACSBC, AAC, LDAC
BatteryAbout 50 hrs with ANC onUp to 50 hrs with ANC on
Folding—Folds flat and inward, hard case included

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

They average the same number. What breaks the tie?
Performance does, at 8.8 against 7.6. That axis covers how well it does the core job. Anker Soundcore Space Q45 leads on Value, Ease of use and Design. If Performance and Durability matter more to you, take the Technics EAH-A800 instead.
Why are the totals this close?
The total is the plain average of the 5 Tech axes, so opposite results cancel. Both average 7.7, while the individual axes run as far apart as 1.2.
Which one ranks higher in "Below the ANC flagships, materials go first"?
Anker Soundcore Space Q45 sits at #2 in "Below the ANC flagships, materials go first", Technics EAH-A800 at #4.