Skip to content

Home head-to-head

BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2vsDyson Solarcycle Morph

The 4 axes split 2-2 and the averages still land 8.6 to 7.7. Value is the widest of them, 7.6 to 5.2.

Lights the desk without taking any of it, if your monitor's top edge and USB port cooperate.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Daylight tracking, a head that docks into the stem, and a bill that reflects the engineering.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 ahead 7.6 to 5.2. They come closest on Durability, 8.8 to 8.4. Left of center is BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2, right is Dyson Solarcycle Morph.

BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 versus Dyson Solarcycle Morph — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 4 axes. Bars for BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 run left from the axis labels, bars for Dyson Solarcycle Morph run right. BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2: Value 7.6, Durability 8.4, Ease of use 9.2, Design 9.0. Dyson Solarcycle Morph: Value 5.2, Durability 8.8, Ease of use 7.2, Design 9.6.BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 (left)Dyson Solarcycle Morph (right)ValueBenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 — Value 7.6 out of 107.6Dyson Solarcycle Morph — Value 5.2 out of 105.2DurabilityBenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 — Durability 8.4 out of 108.4Dyson Solarcycle Morph — Durability 8.8 out of 108.8Ease of useBenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 — Ease of use 9.2 out of 109.2Dyson Solarcycle Morph — Ease of use 7.2 out of 107.2DesignBenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 — Design 9.0 out of 109.0Dyson Solarcycle Morph — Design 9.6 out of 109.6Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2

Leads on Value and Ease of use.

  • A desk where the monitor already occupies the only clear surface
  • Glare on the screen is the actual complaint, not darkness in the room
  • You want the light aimed forward at paper and keyboard, never back at the panel

Take the Dyson Solarcycle Morph

Leads on Durability and Design.

  • The lamp has to work as a floor-standing object in the room, not just a tool
  • You want one fixture that goes from task light to indirect light without moving
  • Warm evening light matters to you enough to automate it

What each one gets wrong

BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2

  • A webcam, a soundbar, or a privacy filter already sits on the top edge
  • You need light on your face for calls — this one points down and away
  • You would rather not charge another accessory

Dyson Solarcycle Morph

  • Connecting a lamp to an account and a Wi-Fi network sounds like a chore
  • You draw or paint and want soft, wide, shadow-free coverage
  • Something has to be repairable years from now — nothing here is user-serviceable

Specs, side by side

SpecBenQ ScreenBar Halo 2Dyson Solarcycle Morph
MountCounterweighted clip over the monitor's top edge
PowerUSB-C, 5V / 3A max
Color temperature2700–6500K2700–6500K
Center illuminanceOver 1000 lux at 50 cm
ControllerWireless, rechargeable
Length50 cm
Light output850 lm
Color renderingCRI 90 minimum
Rated power11.2 W
LED life181,000 hours, per Dyson

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 or Dyson Solarcycle Morph — which should I buy?
BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 takes Value and Ease of use; Dyson Solarcycle Morph takes Durability and Design. Neither leads on more axes than the other, so it comes down to which of those you care about.
Is 0.9 a real difference?
Barely. BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 averages 8.6 and Dyson Solarcycle Morph averages 7.7, and the total is the plain average of 4 axes, so 0.9 is what one axis moving 3.6 looks like after averaging. The axis split, 2-2, tells you more.
Which one ranks higher in "Nothing about a lamp matters until it fits the desk"?
BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 sits at #1 in "Nothing about a lamp matters until it fits the desk", Dyson Solarcycle Morph at #2.