Skip to content
Nungeum

Outdoors head-to-head

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 ozvsOwala FreeSip 32 oz

11 years apart, and the averages land 8.4 and 8.3. Only Value moved much, 8.8 to 7.4.

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz

Hydro Flask

8.3

Insulation at the top of the mainstream bracket, in a finish that survives being dropped.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Owala FreeSip 32 oz

Owala

8.4

The lid solves the actual problem: drink without unscrewing anything, still fit ice.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Owala FreeSip 32 oz ahead 8.8 to 7.4. They come closest on Design, 8.8 to 8.4. Left of center is Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz, right is Owala FreeSip 32 oz.

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz versus Owala FreeSip 32 oz — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 4 axes. Bars for Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz run left from the axis labels, bars for Owala FreeSip 32 oz run right. Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz: Performance 8.8, Value 7.4, Durability 8.6, Design 8.4. Owala FreeSip 32 oz: Performance 8.2, Value 8.8, Durability 7.8, Design 8.8.Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz (left)Owala FreeSip 32 oz (right)PerformanceHydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz — Performance 8.8 out of 108.8Owala FreeSip 32 oz — Performance 8.2 out of 108.2ValueHydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz — Value 7.4 out of 107.4Owala FreeSip 32 oz — Value 8.8 out of 108.8DurabilityHydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz — Durability 8.6 out of 108.6Owala FreeSip 32 oz — Durability 7.8 out of 107.8DesignHydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz — Design 8.4 out of 108.4Owala FreeSip 32 oz — Design 8.8 out of 108.8Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz

Leads on Performance and Durability.

  • Ice that has to survive a full working day
  • The bottle gets dropped on hard surfaces regularly
  • You want interchangeable lids from a large ecosystem

Take the Owala FreeSip 32 oz

Leads on Value and Design.

  • You drink at a desk, one-handed, all day
  • Ice cubes need to fit through the opening
  • A lid that locks shut inside a bag

What each one gets wrong

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz

  • Drinking one-handed matters and buying a second lid does not appeal
  • The premium over equivalent-performing bottles is hard to justify

Owala FreeSip 32 oz

  • Fewer moving parts is your definition of reliable
  • You want a lid you can fully dismantle to clean

Specs, side by side

SpecHydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 ozOwala FreeSip 32 oz
InsulationDouble-wall vacuum, TempShieldDouble-wall vacuum
OpeningWide mouth, standard thread—
FinishPowder coat—
Lid—Sip spout plus wide chug opening
Lock—Push-button lid with lock

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Is the 2020 Owala FreeSip 32 oz the safer pick over the 2009 Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz?
Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz takes Performance and Durability; Owala FreeSip 32 oz takes Value and Design. Neither leads on more axes than the other, so it comes down to which of those you care about. The 11-year gap shows in the totals as 8.4 against 8.3.
What does the 2009 model still win?
On Performance and Durability, yes. Those axes still go to the 2009 model. The 2020 one answers with Value and Design.
Which one ranks higher in "Water bottles leak at the lid, never at the wall"?
Owala FreeSip 32 oz sits at #1 in "Water bottles leak at the lid, never at the wall", Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 32 oz at #2.