Skip to content
Nungeum

Appliances head-to-head

Ecovacs Deebot X2 OmnivsShark Matrix Plus 2-in-1

7.4 against 7.5 overall, which settles nothing. Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 takes Value 8.8 to 7.4, and that is the axis to decide on.

Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni

Ecovacs

7.4

The square body gets closer into corners. App stability is the part worth checking first.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1

Shark

7.5

A base with no bags to buy, and a mop pad that is still a job you do entirely by hand.

Price and availability change constantly, so we don't quote them here — the link opens the current Amazon listing.

Where they diverge

The widest gap is Value, Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 ahead 8.8 to 7.4. They come closest on Performance, 8.2 to 7.6. Left of center is Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni, right is Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1.

Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni versus Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — axis scores out of 10Horizontal bar chart of editorial scores out of 10 across 5 axes. Bars for Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni run left from the axis labels, bars for Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 run right. Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni: Performance 8.2, Value 7.4, Durability 7.0, Ease of use 7.5, Quietness 6.9. Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1: Performance 7.6, Value 8.8, Durability 8.0, Ease of use 6.8, Quietness 6.2.Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni (left)Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 (right)PerformanceEcovacs Deebot X2 Omni — Performance 8.2 out of 108.2Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — Performance 7.6 out of 107.6ValueEcovacs Deebot X2 Omni — Value 7.4 out of 107.4Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — Value 8.8 out of 108.8DurabilityEcovacs Deebot X2 Omni — Durability 7.0 out of 107.0Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — Durability 8.0 out of 108.0Ease of useEcovacs Deebot X2 Omni — Ease of use 7.5 out of 107.5Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — Ease of use 6.8 out of 106.8QuietnessEcovacs Deebot X2 Omni — Quietness 6.9 out of 106.9Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 — Quietness 6.2 out of 106.2Editorial score out of 10 — higher is better

Which one to pick

Take the Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni

Leads on Performance, Ease of use and Quietness.

  • A floor plan with lots of square corners that collect dust
  • You want an all-in-one dock without flagship pricing

Take the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1

Leads on Value and Durability.

  • Long hair is the reason your current vacuum needs rescuing every week
  • You would rather never buy a replacement dock bag again
  • A US warranty and parts you can find without importing them

What each one gets wrong

Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni

  • You have no patience for troubleshooting an app that acts up
  • High thresholds between rooms

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1

  • You wanted mopping to be automatic, because here it is not
  • The dock will live somewhere quiet hours matter
  • Cleaning has to finish quickly, since the grid passes take their time

Specs, side by side

SpecEcovacs Deebot X2 OmniShark Matrix Plus 2-in-1
Suction8,000Pa—
ChassisSquare front—
MoppingSpinning pads, auto-liftSonic pad, 100 scrubs per minute
DockEmpties, hot-water washes, dries—
Base—Bagless self-empty, 60-day capacity
Navigation—360° LiDAR mapping
Brushroll—Self-cleaning, hair does not wrap

Rankings they both appear in

Questions

Only 0.1 separates them. What breaks the tie?
Value does, at 8.8 against 7.4. That axis covers what the same money buys elsewhere. Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 leads on Value and Durability. If Performance, Ease of use and Quietness matter more to you, take the Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni instead.
Why are the totals this close?
The total is the plain average of the 5 Appliances axes, so opposite results cancel. Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni averages 7.4 and Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 averages 7.5, a gap of 0.1, while the individual axes run as far apart as 1.4.
Which one ranks higher in "Every self-emptying base sells you a consumable"?
Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 sits at #2 in "Every self-emptying base sells you a consumable", Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni at #4.